WALSH v. MACKEY, 1:11-CV-321-MR-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120412b97
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of Defendants' "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15). A response to the pending motion was due on or before April 9, 2012, and has not yet been filed. In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that she has a right to respond to Defendants' motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to re
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of Defendants' "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15). A response to the pending motion was due on or before April 9, 2012, and has not yet been filed. In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that she has a right to respond to Defendants' motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to res..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding the filing of Defendants' "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15). A response to the pending motion was due on or before April 9, 2012, and has not yet been filed.
In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, that she has a right to respond to Defendants' motion. The Court also advises Plaintiff that failure to respond may result in Defendants being granted the relief they seek, that is, the dismissal of the Complaint. Under the circumstances, the Court will allow Plaintiff a brief extension of time to file her response.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file a response to the pending "Motion To Dismiss" (Document No. 15) on or before April 20, 2012. Failure to file a timely and persuasive response will likely lead to the dismissal of this lawsuit.
The Clerk of Court is directed to deliver a copy of this Order to Plaintiff by certified U.S. Mail.
Source: Leagle
