U.S. v. TURNER, 3:12cr76. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120425e52
Visitors: 24
Filed: Apr. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2012
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue. Having considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Continue (#9) is GRANTED, and the court finds the delay caused by such continuance shall be excluded in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), as failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the def
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue. Having considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Continue (#9) is GRANTED, and the court finds the delay caused by such continuance shall be excluded in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), as failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the defe..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue. Having considered defendant's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion to Continue (#9) is GRANTED, and the court finds the delay caused by such continuance shall be excluded in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), as failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Additional time to File All Motions (#9) is ALLOWED, and such deadlines are enlarged by 60 days.
Source: Leagle
