PROSPECT CAPITAL CORPORATION v. BENDER, 3:09-CV-465-MOC-DCK. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120611765
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jun. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 92) filed by Douglas R. Ghidina on June 7, 2012, concerning Karl Huth. Mr. Huth seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Counterclaim Defendant, Prospect Capital Corporation. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED t
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 92) filed by Douglas R. Ghidina on June 7, 2012, concerning Karl Huth. Mr. Huth seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Counterclaim Defendant, Prospect Capital Corporation. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED th..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice" (Document No. 92) filed by Douglas R. Ghidina on June 7, 2012, concerning Karl Huth. Mr. Huth seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Counterclaim Defendant, Prospect Capital Corporation.
Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, Mr. Huth is hereby admitted to appear before the Court pro hac vice on behalf of Counterclaim Defendant, Prospect Capital Corporation.
Source: Leagle
