LATIMER v. US SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 3:12CV406-MOC-DSC. (2012)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20120706781
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 05, 2012
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding "United States' Motion To Dismiss" (document #2) filed July 5, 2012. In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison , 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se , that they have a right to respond to Defendant's Motion. The Court also advises Plaintiffs that failure to respond may result in Defendant being granted the relief it seeks, that is, the DISMISSAL
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding "United States' Motion To Dismiss" (document #2) filed July 5, 2012. In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison , 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se , that they have a right to respond to Defendant's Motion. The Court also advises Plaintiffs that failure to respond may result in Defendant being granted the relief it seeks, that is, the DISMISSAL ..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT sua sponte regarding "United States' Motion To Dismiss" (document #2) filed July 5, 2012.
In accordance with Roseboro v. Garrison, 528 F.2d 309 (4th Cir. 1975), the Court advises Plaintiffs, who are proceeding pro se, that they have a right to respond to Defendant's Motion. The Court also advises Plaintiffs that failure to respond may result in Defendant being granted the relief it seeks, that is, the DISMISSAL OF THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiffs are allowed until July 25, 2012 to respond to "United States' Motion To Dismiss."
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
