MASSEY v. COLVIN, 3:12-cv-00385-MOC. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20130710a65
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 09, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2013
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff's untimely Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. De novo review of the Order granting the Commissioner a brief extension of time reveals that such request and the Order granting such relief are both reasonable and fair. Having considered such opposition as an Objection, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Moti
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff's untimely Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. De novo review of the Order granting the Commissioner a brief extension of time reveals that such request and the Order granting such relief are both reasonable and fair. Having considered such opposition as an Objection, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motio..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on plaintiff's untimely Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time. De novo review of the Order granting the Commissioner a brief extension of time reveals that such request and the Order granting such relief are both reasonable and fair. Having considered such opposition as an Objection, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time (#29), deemed to be an Objection to the court's Order (#28), is overruled.
Source: Leagle
