TAIDOC TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION v. DIAGNOSTIC DEVICES, INC., 3:12-CV-00636-MOC-DSC. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20130806942
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2013
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' "Joint Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination" (document # 44) filed on August 5, 2013. Upon due consideration, the Motion is GRANTED. This action is STAYED pending a determination in the currently pending second reexamination proceeding for U.S. Patent No. 7,514,040, and a second request for reexamination for U.S. Patent No. 7,316,766 that Defendants may file within the next sixty (60) days. The parti
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' "Joint Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination" (document # 44) filed on August 5, 2013. Upon due consideration, the Motion is GRANTED. This action is STAYED pending a determination in the currently pending second reexamination proceeding for U.S. Patent No. 7,514,040, and a second request for reexamination for U.S. Patent No. 7,316,766 that Defendants may file within the next sixty (60) days. The partie..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' "Joint Motion to Stay Pending Reexamination" (document # 44) filed on August 5, 2013. Upon due consideration, the Motion is GRANTED.
This action is STAYED pending a determination in the currently pending second reexamination proceeding for U.S. Patent No. 7,514,040, and a second request for reexamination for U.S. Patent No. 7,316,766 that Defendants may file within the next sixty (60) days. The parties SHALL FILE a joint status report within fourteen (14) days after a decision in the specified reexaminations informing the Court of the decisions and, if applicable, requesting the Court to lift the stay.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
