U.S. v. RATTLER, 2:13-cr-00012-MR-DLH-5. (2013)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20130830a93
Visitors: 16
Filed: Aug. 28, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 28, 2013
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's pro se appeal of the Order of Detention [Doc. 69] entered on August 19, 2013. [Doc. 71]. The Defendant is currently represented by counsel. [See Doc. 21]. The Court does not ordinarily entertain motions filed by a criminal defendant who is represented by counsel and who has not formally waived his right to counsel. See LCrR 47.1(H). Accordingly, the Defendant's pro se appeal of the Order of Dete
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's pro se appeal of the Order of Detention [Doc. 69] entered on August 19, 2013. [Doc. 71]. The Defendant is currently represented by counsel. [See Doc. 21]. The Court does not ordinarily entertain motions filed by a criminal defendant who is represented by counsel and who has not formally waived his right to counsel. See LCrR 47.1(H). Accordingly, the Defendant's pro se appeal of the Order of Deten..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's pro se appeal of the Order of Detention [Doc. 69] entered on August 19, 2013. [Doc. 71].
The Defendant is currently represented by counsel. [See Doc. 21]. The Court does not ordinarily entertain motions filed by a criminal defendant who is represented by counsel and who has not formally waived his right to counsel. See LCrR 47.1(H). Accordingly, the Defendant's pro se appeal of the Order of Detention is denied.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's appeal of the Order of Detention [Doc. 71] is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
