Filed: Mar. 15, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 15, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss Defendant BW/IP, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, incorrectly named in the Complaint as "BW/IP International, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Byron Jackson Company" [Doc. 99]. For the reasons stated in the motion, and for cause shown, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Joint Motion [Doc. 99] is GRANTED, and all of the Plaintiffs' claims against the De
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss Defendant BW/IP, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, incorrectly named in the Complaint as "BW/IP International, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Byron Jackson Company" [Doc. 99]. For the reasons stated in the motion, and for cause shown, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Joint Motion [Doc. 99] is GRANTED, and all of the Plaintiffs' claims against the Def..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss Defendant BW/IP, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, incorrectly named in the Complaint as "BW/IP International, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Byron Jackson Company" [Doc. 99].
For the reasons stated in the motion, and for cause shown,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Joint Motion [Doc. 99] is GRANTED, and all of the Plaintiffs' claims against the Defendant BW/IP, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, incorrectly named in the Complaint as "BW/IP International, Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Byron Jackson Company" are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
