GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. SHEIN, 3:14-cv-00137-MOC. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140408976
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on Sara W. Higgins' Motions for Pro Hac Vice admission of Daniel T. Brier (#3) and Donna A. Walsh (#4). Having considered Sara W. Higgins' motions and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Sara W. Higgins' Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Daniel T. Brier (#3) and Donna A. Walsh (#4) are GRANTED, and such attorneys are admitted to practice pro hac vice
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on Sara W. Higgins' Motions for Pro Hac Vice admission of Daniel T. Brier (#3) and Donna A. Walsh (#4). Having considered Sara W. Higgins' motions and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Sara W. Higgins' Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Daniel T. Brier (#3) and Donna A. Walsh (#4) are GRANTED, and such attorneys are admitted to practice pro hac vice ..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on Sara W. Higgins' Motions for Pro Hac Vice admission of Daniel T. Brier (#3) and Donna A. Walsh (#4). Having considered Sara W. Higgins' motions and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Sara W. Higgins' Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Daniel T. Brier (#3) and Donna A. Walsh (#4) are GRANTED, and such attorneys are admitted to practice pro hac vice Ms. Higgins in this particular case.
Source: Leagle
