FERRELL v. CITY OF CHARLOTTE, 3:14-cv-47. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20140514d43
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 13, 2014
Latest Update: May 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN, Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 10), and Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 14). The Court conducted a hearing on this matter on May 13, 2014. For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court will GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendants' Motion. All proceedings in this case are stayed for sixty (60) days from the entry of this order with the exception that Plaintiff may tak
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN, Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 10), and Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 14). The Court conducted a hearing on this matter on May 13, 2014. For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court will GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendants' Motion. All proceedings in this case are stayed for sixty (60) days from the entry of this order with the exception that Plaintiff may take..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Stay (Doc. No. 4), Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 10), and Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 14). The Court conducted a hearing on this matter on May 13, 2014. For the reasons stated at the hearing, the Court will GRANT in part and DENY in part Defendants' Motion. All proceedings in this case are stayed for sixty (60) days from the entry of this order with the exception that Plaintiff may take the depositions of the two officers other than Officer Kerrick who were present at the scene on the evening in question. During the sixty-day period, the parties are directed to craft a discovery plan which takes into account the directions of the Court offered at the hearing, namely that Officer Kerrick may not be deposed or otherwise called upon to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights until the completion of his criminal trial. The parties are further directed to notify the Court once this plan has been completed; the Court will thereafter reconvene the parties to discuss its implementation.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
