Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. MYLES, 3:12-CR-239. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20140602b75 Visitors: 17
Filed: May 30, 2014
Latest Update: May 30, 2014
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant's Motion to Adopt Motion for New Trial by Co-Defendant (Doc. No. 404). On November 7, 2013, Defendant Myles requested to join a Motion for New Trial filed by Defendant Nathan Wolf (Doc. No. 403). The Court held a hearing on Wolf's motion on January 30, 2014 and denied his motion on the same day (Doc. No. 483). 1 In an abundance of caution, the Court reserved judgment on Defendant Myles' Motion to Adopt, as
More

ORDER

GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant's Motion to Adopt Motion for New Trial by Co-Defendant (Doc. No. 404). On November 7, 2013, Defendant Myles requested to join a Motion for New Trial filed by Defendant Nathan Wolf (Doc. No. 403). The Court held a hearing on Wolf's motion on January 30, 2014 and denied his motion on the same day (Doc. No. 483).1 In an abundance of caution, the Court reserved judgment on Defendant Myles' Motion to Adopt, as she was unrepresented at the time. Since that time, Defendant Myles has obtained new counsel. As such, having denied the motion that Defendant Myles sought to join, the Court will TERMINATE her Motion (Doc. No. 404) as MOOT.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Court notes that Defendant Wolf's Motion for New Trial was premised almost entirely on his advice of counsel defense presented at trial. Defendant Myles presented no such defense.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer