USA v. DANIELS, 3:05-CR-00103-RJC-DCK. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20141010958
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motions of the defendant pro se to correct clerical mistakes in his presentence report (PSR). (Doc. Nos. 463, 466). The defendant complains that the Bureau of Prisons has made security classification decisions based on errant information in the PSR. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit previously found that the Court correctly calculated the advisory guideline range, which involved determin
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motions of the defendant pro se to correct clerical mistakes in his presentence report (PSR). (Doc. Nos. 463, 466). The defendant complains that the Bureau of Prisons has made security classification decisions based on errant information in the PSR. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit previously found that the Court correctly calculated the advisory guideline range, which involved determina..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motions of the defendant pro se to correct clerical mistakes in his presentence report (PSR). (Doc. Nos. 463, 466).
The defendant complains that the Bureau of Prisons has made security classification decisions based on errant information in the PSR. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit previously found that the Court correctly calculated the advisory guideline range, which involved determination of the drug quantity attributable to the defendant. (Doc. No. 439: Opinion at 4; PSR at ¶ 28).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's motion are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
