Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. MUSLIM, 3:13-CR-00307-RJC-DCK. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20141010963 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 09, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2014
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se for a new trial. (Doc. No. 81). In the motion, the defendant complains that the Court improperly denied his request for new counsel, that counsel provided ineffective assistance, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. The Court made rulings during the trial that the defendant was not entitled to relief on any of these issues. The conclusory allegatio
More

ORDER

ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., District Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the defendant pro se for a new trial. (Doc. No. 81).

In the motion, the defendant complains that the Court improperly denied his request for new counsel, that counsel provided ineffective assistance, and that the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's verdict. The Court made rulings during the trial that the defendant was not entitled to relief on any of these issues. The conclusory allegations in the instant motion do not provide a sufficient basis to reconsider those rulings.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the defendant's pro se motion of a new trial, (Doc. No. 81), is DENIED.

The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this order to the defendant, counsel for the defendant, to the United States Attorney, the United States Marshals Service, and the United States Probation Office.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer