JONES v. HILL, 1:13-cv-00328-MR-DSC. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20141021k62
Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's "Opposition to Dismiss Lawsuit for Conspiracy and Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law" [Doc. 144], which the Court takes to be intended as a motion for reconsideration. Upon careful review and consideration, and for the reasons previously stated, the Court denied the Plaintiff's request for reconsideration. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's "Opposition" [Doc. 144], whi
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's "Opposition to Dismiss Lawsuit for Conspiracy and Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law" [Doc. 144], which the Court takes to be intended as a motion for reconsideration. Upon careful review and consideration, and for the reasons previously stated, the Court denied the Plaintiff's request for reconsideration. Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's "Opposition" [Doc. 144], whic..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's "Opposition to Dismiss Lawsuit for Conspiracy and Deprivation of Rights under Color of Law" [Doc. 144], which the Court takes to be intended as a motion for reconsideration.
Upon careful review and consideration, and for the reasons previously stated, the Court denied the Plaintiff's request for reconsideration.
Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiff's "Opposition" [Doc. 144], which the Court construes as a motion for reconsideration, is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle