Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. SHEIN LAW CENTER, LTD., 3:14-cv-00137-MOC-DSC. (2014)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20141027850 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the "Motion to Unseal" (document #31) filed by Movants Ford Motor Company, Honeywell International Inc., Resolute Management, Inc., AIU Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, Granite State Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Mt. McKinley Insurance Comp
More

ORDER

DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the "Motion to Unseal" (document #31) filed by Movants Ford Motor Company, Honeywell International Inc., Resolute Management, Inc., AIU Insurance Company, American Home Assurance Company, Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania, Granite State Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Mt. McKinley Insurance Company and Everest Reinsurance Company.

For the reasons stated in the "Memorandum of Decision and Order" (document #90) entered by the Honorable Max O. Cogburn, Jr. on July 23, 2014 in Civil File No. 3:13cv464-MOC, and for the other reasons stated in the Movants' briefs, the Court finds that the sealed filings in this matter are subject to the public's right of access.

Accordingly, the Motion to Unseal is GRANTED. The Court VACATES its earlier sealing Orders, UNSEALS all sealed filings in this matter, and directs the Clerk of Court to make such filings available to the public in their entirety on the same terms as all other papers filed in this case.

In the same "Memorandum of Decision and Order" (document #90), Civil File No. 3:13cv464-MOC, Judge Cogburn also withdrew the earlier reference to Bankruptcy Court and referred this case to the undersigned for pretrial management. Motions pending in the Bankruptcy Court file will not be considered unless they are filed in this case. The briefing schedule set forth in LCvR 7.1(E) shall apply to these Motions. Briefs filed in this case prior to entry of this Order will not be considered.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer