U.S. v. PARKER, 3:11-cr-00282-MOC-DSC. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20141104943
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 03, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 03, 2014
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's pro se letter (#43) requesting information from the court regarding whether she qualifies for release from probation. Review of the pleadings reveals that defendant is represented by counsel who, in discussing the matter with defendant, can assess whether such a motion is appropriate in this case. The Local Criminal Rules, however, prohibit a represented defendant from bringing such a motion on his or
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's pro se letter (#43) requesting information from the court regarding whether she qualifies for release from probation. Review of the pleadings reveals that defendant is represented by counsel who, in discussing the matter with defendant, can assess whether such a motion is appropriate in this case. The Local Criminal Rules, however, prohibit a represented defendant from bringing such a motion on his or h..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's pro se letter (#43) requesting information from the court regarding whether she qualifies for release from probation. Review of the pleadings reveals that defendant is represented by counsel who, in discussing the matter with defendant, can assess whether such a motion is appropriate in this case. The Local Criminal Rules, however, prohibit a represented defendant from bringing such a motion on his or her own. See L.Cr.R. 47.1 (H). Accordingly, the court will give no further consideration to defendant's letter.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that to the extent defendant seeks relief in her pro se letter (#43), such relief is DENIED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
