ECKLES v. U.S., 5:05-CR-00009-RLV-DCK-3 (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20141107a04
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of Petitioner's pro se motion for a certificate of appealability. On September 29, 2014, this Court entered an order denying and dismissing the Petitioner's 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence. (Doc. No. 26). The Court found that Petitioner's claims were without merit and expressly declined to grant a certificate of appealability. After considering Petitioner's present motion, the C
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of Petitioner's pro se motion for a certificate of appealability. On September 29, 2014, this Court entered an order denying and dismissing the Petitioner's 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence. (Doc. No. 26). The Court found that Petitioner's claims were without merit and expressly declined to grant a certificate of appealability. After considering Petitioner's present motion, the Co..
More
ORDER
RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on consideration of Petitioner's pro se motion for a certificate of appealability.
On September 29, 2014, this Court entered an order denying and dismissing the Petitioner's § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence. (Doc. No. 26). The Court found that Petitioner's claims were without merit and expressly declined to grant a certificate of appealability. After considering Petitioner's present motion, the Court finds that the motion for a certificate of appealability will be denied for the reasons stated in the Court's September 29th Order of dismissal.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for a certificate of appealability is DENIED. (Doc. No. 28).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
