VOSK v. COLVIN, 1:14-cv-00117-FDW. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20141119d79
Visitors: 37
Filed: Nov. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2014
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Consent Motion to Remand to the Social Security Administration (Doc. No. 11). For the reasons stated in the motion, it is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of Defendant's motion, with Plaintiff's co
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Consent Motion to Remand to the Social Security Administration (Doc. No. 11). For the reasons stated in the motion, it is GRANTED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), and in light of Defendant's motion, with Plaintiff's con..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Consent Motion to Remand to the Social Security Administration (Doc. No. 11). For the reasons stated in the motion, it is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying, or reversing Defendant's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of Defendant's motion, with Plaintiff's consent, to remand this action for further administrative proceedings and development, the Court hereby remands this case to Defendant, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further administrative proceedings and development. See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991); Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
