US AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION v. VELEZ, 3:14-CV-577-RJC-DCK. (2014)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20141126f53
Visitors: 2
Filed: Nov. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Motion For Jurisdictional Discovery As To Defendants Velez And Leonidas" (Document No. 22) filed November 24, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion, without prejudice to re-file. Plainti
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Motion For Jurisdictional Discovery As To Defendants Velez And Leonidas" (Document No. 22) filed November 24, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion, without prejudice to re-file. Plaintif..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Plaintiff's Motion For Jurisdictional Discovery As To Defendants Velez And Leonidas" (Document No. 22) filed November 24, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion, without prejudice to re-file. Plaintiffs have failed to show that the requirement of consultation has been met pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(B).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Plaintiff's Motion For Jurisdictional Discovery As To Defendants Velez And Leonidas" (Document No. 22) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
