HESTER v. VERIZON WIRELESS, 3:14-CV-552-RJC-DCK. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150106c09
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant's "Motion To Compel Arbitration" (Document No. 6) filed December 3, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion as moot. The undersigned notes that the parties filed "Notice Of Settlement And Req
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant's "Motion To Compel Arbitration" (Document No. 6) filed December 3, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion as moot. The undersigned notes that the parties filed "Notice Of Settlement And Requ..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Defendant's "Motion To Compel Arbitration" (Document No. 6) filed December 3, 2014. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion, the record, and applicable authority, the undersigned will deny the motion as moot. The undersigned notes that the parties filed "Notice Of Settlement And Request To Stay All Deadlines" (Document No. 7) on December 13, 2014.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant's "Motion To Compel Arbitration" (Document No. 6) is DENIED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
