HARRIS v. COLVIN, 3:14-cv-00308-MOC-DLH. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150120b73
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation recommending remand to the Commissioner based on a consent Motion to Remand (#13). Having considered such Recommendation and motion and no objections having been filed in the time allowed, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the consent Motion to Remand (#13) is ALLOWED, the Motion for Summary Judgment (#11) is termed as MOOT, the final deci
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation recommending remand to the Commissioner based on a consent Motion to Remand (#13). Having considered such Recommendation and motion and no objections having been filed in the time allowed, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the consent Motion to Remand (#13) is ALLOWED, the Motion for Summary Judgment (#11) is termed as MOOT, the final decis..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on the Memorandum and Recommendation recommending remand to the Commissioner based on a consent Motion to Remand (#13). Having considered such Recommendation and motion and no objections having been filed in the time allowed, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the consent Motion to Remand (#13) is ALLOWED, the Motion for Summary Judgment (#11) is termed as MOOT, the final decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED and this matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this Order, all in accordance with Sentence Four of Section 405(g).
Source: Leagle
