YOUNG v. AGCO CORPORATION, 1:13-cv-00054-MR-DLH. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150128e52
Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss AGCO Corporation [Doc. 177]. Upon review of the parties' motion, IT IS, THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 177] is GRANTED , and the Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Lucas Varity Automotive Holdings Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Massey Ferguson Limited, and as assignee of Lucas Varity (sued individually and as successor-in-interest
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss AGCO Corporation [Doc. 177]. Upon review of the parties' motion, IT IS, THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 177] is GRANTED , and the Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Lucas Varity Automotive Holdings Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Massey Ferguson Limited, and as assignee of Lucas Varity (sued individually and as successor-in-interest t..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss AGCO Corporation [Doc. 177].
Upon review of the parties' motion,
IT IS, THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' Joint Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 177] is GRANTED, and the Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Lucas Varity Automotive Holdings Corporation, as successor-in-interest to Massey Ferguson Limited, and as assignee of Lucas Varity (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Massey Ferguson Limited), and named in the Complaint and amendments thereto as AGCO Corporation, are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
