SHOEMAKE v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, 5:13-CV-013-RLV-DCK. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150203c93
Visitors: 4
Filed: Feb. 02, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 02, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 62) filed by Paul J. Osowski concerning Andrew E. Schinzel on February 2, 2015. Mr. Andrew E. Schinzel seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Eli Lilly and Company. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice " (Document No. 62) filed by Paul J. Osowski concerning Andrew E. Schinzel on February 2, 2015. Mr. Andrew E. Schinzel seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Eli Lilly and Company. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED ..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the "Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice" (Document No. 62) filed by Paul J. Osowski concerning Andrew E. Schinzel on February 2, 2015. Mr. Andrew E. Schinzel seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Defendant Eli Lilly and Company. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee, the Court will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the Application For Admission To Practice Pro Hac Vice (Document No. 62) is GRANTED. Mr. Andrew E. Schinzel is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Defendant Eli Lilly and Company.
Source: Leagle
