U.S. v. WILLOUGHBY, 3:99CR24. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150206d08
Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's motion (Doc.# 614 & 628) for "reconsiderations" of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and the Reduced sentence based upon Amendment 782 guidelines. The U. S. Probation Office is directed to prepare a Supplemental Presentence Investigation Report to determine whether any retroactive Amendments to the U. S. Sentencing Guidelines have any affect on the Defendant's original Sentencing Guideline ra
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's motion (Doc.# 614 & 628) for "reconsiderations" of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) and the Reduced sentence based upon Amendment 782 guidelines. The U. S. Probation Office is directed to prepare a Supplemental Presentence Investigation Report to determine whether any retroactive Amendments to the U. S. Sentencing Guidelines have any affect on the Defendant's original Sentencing Guideline ran..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Defendant's motion (Doc.# 614 & 628) for "reconsiderations" of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3582(c)(2) and the Reduced sentence based upon Amendment 782 guidelines. The U. S. Probation Office is directed to prepare a Supplemental Presentence Investigation Report to determine whether any retroactive Amendments to the U. S. Sentencing Guidelines have any affect on the Defendant's original Sentencing Guideline range.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
