Filed: Feb. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the pro se Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel" (document # 13) filed December 24, 2015, as well as the parties' briefs and exhibits. Plaintiff seeks production of a "dash cam video" taken by Defendant Bignall on April 30, 2011 at 2:16 a.m. In their Response, Defendants Bignall and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department represent that the video was included in their Rule 26 initial disclosures. See document #15. In hi
Summary: ORDER DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court on the pro se Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel" (document # 13) filed December 24, 2015, as well as the parties' briefs and exhibits. Plaintiff seeks production of a "dash cam video" taken by Defendant Bignall on April 30, 2011 at 2:16 a.m. In their Response, Defendants Bignall and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department represent that the video was included in their Rule 26 initial disclosures. See document #15. In his..
More
ORDER
DAVID S. CAYER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the pro se Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel" (document # 13) filed December 24, 2015, as well as the parties' briefs and exhibits.
Plaintiff seeks production of a "dash cam video" taken by Defendant Bignall on April 30, 2011 at 2:16 a.m. In their Response, Defendants Bignall and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department represent that the video was included in their Rule 26 initial disclosures. See document #15. In his Reply, Plaintiff states that he has received a disk but it contains "no visual footage, only data showed."
Because Defendants concede that the dash cam video is properly discoverable, Plaintiff's Motion will be granted.
NOW IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's "Motion to Compel" (document # 13) is GRANTED. Within fourteen days of this Order, Defendants shall produce the video referenced above in an accessible format. If Defendants have already produced that video, they may fulfill their obligation under this Order by serving Plaintiff with a verified discovery response in that regard.
2. The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to the pro se Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants, and to the Honorable Robert J. Conrad, Jr.
SO ORDERED.
