AUSTIN v. REXON INDUSTRIAL CORP., 1:14-cv-00066-MR-DLH. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150409c36
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. On April 6, 2015, the Defendants filed briefs in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and their Motion to Exclude and/or Limit Plaintiff's Expert Testimony [Docs. 31, 33]. The Defendants' briefs, however, fail to comply with this Court's Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan, which requires that briefs must be in at least 14 point type. [Doc. 10 at 5]. Accordingly, the Defendants' supporting
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. On April 6, 2015, the Defendants filed briefs in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and their Motion to Exclude and/or Limit Plaintiff's Expert Testimony [Docs. 31, 33]. The Defendants' briefs, however, fail to comply with this Court's Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan, which requires that briefs must be in at least 14 point type. [Doc. 10 at 5]. Accordingly, the Defendants' supporting ..
More
ORDER
MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.
On April 6, 2015, the Defendants filed briefs in support of their Motion for Summary Judgment and their Motion to Exclude and/or Limit Plaintiff's Expert Testimony [Docs. 31, 33]. The Defendants' briefs, however, fail to comply with this Court's Pretrial Order and Case Management Plan, which requires that briefs must be in at least 14 point type. [Doc. 10 at 5]. Accordingly, the Defendants' supporting briefs will be stricken.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants' Motion to Exclude and/or Limit Plaintiff's Expert Testimony [Doc. 31] and the Defendants' Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. 33] are STRICKEN. The Defendants may file briefs which comply with the requirements of this Court within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
