Filed: Apr. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2015
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412 (Doc. 17). The Commissioner does not oppose Plaintiff's motion. (Doc. 17). For the reasons stated therein, the motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to the power of this Court to award fees to a prevailing party other than the United States incurred by that party in a civil action against the United States, including proceedings for
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412 (Doc. 17). The Commissioner does not oppose Plaintiff's motion. (Doc. 17). For the reasons stated therein, the motion is GRANTED. Pursuant to the power of this Court to award fees to a prevailing party other than the United States incurred by that party in a civil action against the United States, including proceedings for ..
More
ORDER
RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiff's Consent Motion for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (Doc. 17). The Commissioner does not oppose Plaintiff's motion. (Doc. 17). For the reasons stated therein, the motion is GRANTED.
Pursuant to the power of this Court to award fees to a prevailing party other than the United States incurred by that party in a civil action against the United States, including proceedings for judicial review of agency action, under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), and in light of this Court's March 25, 2015 order remanding this case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court will award attorney's fees in the amount of four thousand four hundred forty-one dollars and twenty-five cents ($4,441.25). No additional petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) shall be filed.
Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 1251 (2010), these attorney's fees are payable to Plaintiff as the prevailing party and are subject to offset through the Treasury Department's Offset Program to satisfy any pre-existing debt Plaintiff may owe to the government. If, subsequent to the entry of this Order, the Commissioner determines that Plaintiff owes no debt to the government that would subject this award of attorney's fees to offset, the Commissioner may honor Plaintiff's January 5, 2014 signed assignment of EAJA fees, providing for payment of the subject fees to Plaintiff's counsel, rather than to Plaintiff. If, however, Plaintiff is discovered to owe the government any debt subject to offset, the Commissioner shall pay any attorney's fee to Plaintiff's counsel in accordance with the above agreement.
IT IS SO ORDERED.