Filed: Apr. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiffs' "Motion To Reconsider Court Order Or Amend Scheduling Order" (Document No. 60) filed April 17, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will deny the motion in part, and grant the motion in part. The Court recognizes that no r
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiffs' "Motion To Reconsider Court Order Or Amend Scheduling Order" (Document No. 60) filed April 17, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will deny the motion in part, and grant the motion in part. The Court recognizes that no re..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on Plaintiffs' "Motion To Reconsider Court Order Or Amend Scheduling Order" (Document No. 60) filed April 17, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the undersigned will deny the motion in part, and grant the motion in part.
The Court recognizes that no response has been filed, but in the interests of judicial economy and efficient case management, the Court will address the pending motion without delay. The undersigned will deny Plaintiff's request to reconsider the prior ruling allowing Defendant additional time to produce discovery responses, but will grant the request to make similar amendments to other case deadlines.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Plaintiffs' "Motion To Reconsider Court Order Or Amend Scheduling Order" (Document No. 60) is DENIED in part, and GRANTED in part. The deadlines in this case are revised as follows: Expert Reports — June 10, 2015; Rebuttal Reports — June 26, 2015; Discovery Completion — July 10, 2015; Mediation Report — July 20, 2015; Dispositive Motions — August 5, 2015; Trial — November 2, 2015.
SO ORDERED.
