McINTYRE v. CHELSEA THERAPEUTICS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., 3:12-cv-00213-MOC-DCK. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150507c47
Visitors: 11
Filed: May 06, 2015
Latest Update: May 06, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on two letters from the parties (## 96, 97) which have been appropriately categorized as miscellaneous filings in ECF. Both of these filings request substantive relief from the court, and as such, must be filed appropriately. The parties are instructed to re-file their motions in accordance with the requirements of Local Rule 7.1. The court therefore enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED t
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on two letters from the parties (## 96, 97) which have been appropriately categorized as miscellaneous filings in ECF. Both of these filings request substantive relief from the court, and as such, must be filed appropriately. The parties are instructed to re-file their motions in accordance with the requirements of Local Rule 7.1. The court therefore enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED th..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on two letters from the parties (## 96, 97) which have been appropriately categorized as miscellaneous filings in ECF. Both of these filings request substantive relief from the court, and as such, must be filed appropriately. The parties are instructed to re-file their motions in accordance with the requirements of Local Rule 7.1. The court therefore enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that to the extent the parties request relief and/or decisions from this court in their respective letters (##96, 97), such requests are denied without prejudice. The parties are instructed to submit motions in the appropriate format, as outlined in LCvR 7.1.
Source: Leagle
