SHOEMAKE v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY, 5:13-CV-013-RLV-DCK. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150511843
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 07, 2015
Latest Update: May 07, 2015
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , District Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Eli Lilly And Company's Motion To Seal" (Document No. 85) filed May 4, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting Plaintiff's consent, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Defendant Eli Lilly And Company
Summary: ORDER DAVID C. KEESLER , District Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Eli Lilly And Company's Motion To Seal" (Document No. 85) filed May 4, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting Plaintiff's consent, the undersigned will grant the motion. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Defendant Eli Lilly And Company'..
More
ORDER
DAVID C. KEESLER, District Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on "Defendant Eli Lilly And Company's Motion To Seal" (Document No. 85) filed May 4, 2015. This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and immediate review is appropriate. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, and noting Plaintiff's consent, the undersigned will grant the motion.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that "Defendant Eli Lilly And Company's Motion To Seal" (Document No. 85) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following documents shall be sealed until otherwise ordered by the Court:
1. Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Prove General Causation, Specific Causation, Inadequate Warning and Proximate Causation (Document No. 104);
2. Memorandum in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Based on Federal Preemption of Plaintiff's Failure-to-Warn Claims (Document No. 108);
3. Memorandum in Support of Motion to Exclude the Proposed Testimony of Barbara K. Burton, M.D. (Document No. 88);
4. Memorandum in Support of Motion to Exclude the Proposed Testimony of Mila G. Carlson, Ph.D., R.N., CLNC, CNLCP and Jeffrey B. Opp (Document No. 97);
5. Memorandum in Support of Motion to Exclude the Proposed Testimony of Nicholas Jewell, Ph.D. (Document No. 94);
6. Memorandum in Support of Motion to Exclude the Proposed Testimony of Thomas W. Sadler, Ph.D. and Robert M. Cabrera, Ph.D. (Document No. 100);
7. Memorandum in Support of Motion to Exclude the Proposed Testimony of Clifford Siporin, Ph.D. (Document No. 91); and
8. Exhibits 45 — 101 from the "Index to Exhibits in Defendant's Memoranda in Support of Motions for Summary Judgment and To Exclude Expert Testimony Filed May 4, 2015." (Document No. 112).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
