BARNETTE v. U.S., 3:12cv327-V (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150623b68
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES , District Judge . THIS MATTE R is before the Court upon its own motion in order to correct the date by which Respondent may file a response to Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's June 18, 2015 Order (Doc. No. 92) is AMENDED to state the following: Respondent's motion (ECF No. 91) is GRANTED . The time within which Respondent may respond to Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is extended by thirty (30) da
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES , District Judge . THIS MATTE R is before the Court upon its own motion in order to correct the date by which Respondent may file a response to Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's June 18, 2015 Order (Doc. No. 92) is AMENDED to state the following: Respondent's motion (ECF No. 91) is GRANTED . The time within which Respondent may respond to Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is extended by thirty (30) day..
More
ORDER
RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon its own motion in order to correct the date by which Respondent may file a response to Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Court's June 18, 2015 Order (Doc. No. 92) is AMENDED to state the following: Respondent's motion (ECF No. 91) is GRANTED. The time within which Respondent may respond to Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing is extended by thirty (30) days, up to and including July 22, 2015.
Source: Leagle
