LUCZAK-SMITH v. SOWINSKI, 3:14-cv-00238-MOC-DSC. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150625d69
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Word Limit to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement [ sic ] Replies. While such request contains unnecessary contentions concerning the inclusion of parties and lacks a certificate of consultation, the court will grant the proposed extension of the word limit. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Word Limit to Defendants' Motion f
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Word Limit to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement [ sic ] Replies. While such request contains unnecessary contentions concerning the inclusion of parties and lacks a certificate of consultation, the court will grant the proposed extension of the word limit. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Word Limit to Defendants' Motion fo..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Word Limit to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement [sic] Replies. While such request contains unnecessary contentions concerning the inclusion of parties and lacks a certificate of consultation, the court will grant the proposed extension of the word limit.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Word Limit to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgement [sic] Replies (#126) is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
