Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WATTERSON v. BURGESS, 3:13-cv-00159-FDW-DCK. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20150727814 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 24, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2015
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Randolph A. Watterson's letter to the undersigned of Court (Doc. No. 70). In his letter, which this Court liberally construes to be more appropriately considered as a "motion," Plaintiff Randolph A. Watterson requests this Court to permit him to participate in the mediation scheduled in accordance with the Pro Se Settlement Assistance Program ("PSAP"). This Court has previously denied this Plaintiff
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiff Randolph A. Watterson's letter to the undersigned of Court (Doc. No. 70). In his letter, which this Court liberally construes to be more appropriately considered as a "motion," Plaintiff Randolph A. Watterson requests this Court to permit him to participate in the mediation scheduled in accordance with the Pro Se Settlement Assistance Program ("PSAP"). This Court has previously denied this Plaintiff's request to participate in this voluntary program because he is resides outside this district and because the Clerk was unable to find an attorney to represent him. (Docs. Nos. 56, 60). The arguments in Randolph A. Watterson's instant "motion" do not change this fact. Accordingly, this motion is DENIED. This ruling should not deter the parties, including both Plaintiffs, from communicating with each other and engaging in settlement discussions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer