U.S. v. ELLIOTT, 1:15-cr-00050-MOC. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20150813a62
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 12, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 12, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Request for Review of Magistrate Court's Order (#20). While the detention decision of the magistrate judge will be vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of recent developments in appellate jurisprudence, as outlined in the government's Response, the Federal Defender is reminded that a United States Magistrate Judge does not preside over "magistrate's court" as her motion suggests, but
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Request for Review of Magistrate Court's Order (#20). While the detention decision of the magistrate judge will be vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of recent developments in appellate jurisprudence, as outlined in the government's Response, the Federal Defender is reminded that a United States Magistrate Judge does not preside over "magistrate's court" as her motion suggests, but i..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Request for Review of Magistrate Court's Order (#20). While the detention decision of the magistrate judge will be vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of recent developments in appellate jurisprudence, as outlined in the government's Response, the Federal Defender is reminded that a United States Magistrate Judge does not preside over "magistrate's court" as her motion suggests, but is a judge of the district court who at all times presides in the district court.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Request for Review of Magistrate Court's Order (#s 20 & 21) are GRANTED, and the determination and Order of detention is VACATED and REMANDED for further consideration in light of the government's Response.
Source: Leagle
