Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JARED v. TRANSIT U.S.A., INC., 1:15-cv-00162-MR-DLH. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20150901a64 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. On August 11, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of this action. [Doc. 5]. Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that in order to dismiss a case, a notice of dismissal may be filed by a plaintiff before the opposing party has served either an answer or motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i). In the event that an answer or summary judgment moti
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte.

On August 11, 2015, the Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of this action. [Doc. 5]. Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that in order to dismiss a case, a notice of dismissal may be filed by a plaintiff before the opposing party has served either an answer or motion for summary judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(i). In the event that an answer or summary judgment motion has been filed, the parties must file a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared in the action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii). Here, because the Defendant filed an Answer, the Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal does not serve to dismiss the action.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulation of dismissal within seven (7) days of the entry of this Order. Failure to file a stipulation within the time required will result in the dismissal of this action without further Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer