Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

US AIRLINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION v. VELEZ, 3:14-cv-00577-RJC-DCK. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20151002q95 Visitors: 2
Filed: Sep. 30, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 30, 2015
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr , District Judge . THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants Gary Hummel, Stephen Bradford, Rob Streble, John Taylor, Joe Stein, Pete Dugstad, and Stephen Nathan's as well as Defendants Steve Smyser and Jay Milkey's (collectively, "Defendants") "Motion[s] to Vacate the Order Dated March 5, 2015, or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss the Verified Complaint" (the "Motions to Vacate or Dismiss"), Supporting Memoranda, and Exhibits. (Doc. Nos. 49, 50). The fact
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendants Gary Hummel, Stephen Bradford, Rob Streble, John Taylor, Joe Stein, Pete Dugstad, and Stephen Nathan's as well as Defendants Steve Smyser and Jay Milkey's (collectively, "Defendants") "Motion[s] to Vacate the Order Dated March 5, 2015, or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss the Verified Complaint" (the "Motions to Vacate or Dismiss"), Supporting Memoranda, and Exhibits. (Doc. Nos. 49, 50).

The facts, in their briefest form, are summarized in the Court's Order granting Preliminary Injunction (the "Preliminary Injunction Order"), which was entered on August 27, 2015. (Doc. No. 75). In the Preliminary Injunction Order, the Court found that it has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims in this case and that Plaintiffs have satisfied the procedural requirements under the Labor Management Reporting and Disclosure Act ("LMRDA"). Such a determination regarding the requirements of the LMRDA implicitly finds that Judge Max O. Cogburn, Jr.'s March 5, 2015 Order was proper. Furthermore, in analyzing and making a determination of whether Plaintiffs satisfied the elements for a preliminary injunction, the Court found that Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits of their claims. Having already made these determinations, the Court finds that Defendants Motions to Vacate or Dismiss are moot.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendants Gary Hummel, Stephen Bradford, Rob Streble, John Taylor, Joe Stein, Pete Dugstad, and Stephen Nathan's "Motion to Vacate the Order Dated March 5, 2015, or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss the Verified Complaint," (Doc. No. 49), is DISMISSED as moot; and Defendants Steve Smyser and Jay Milkey's "Motion to Vacate the Order Dated March 5, 2015, or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss the Verified Complaint," (Doc. No. 50), is DISMISSED as moot.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer