U.S. v. JOHNSON, 3:15-cr-158-MOC-1. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20151014a94
Visitors: 9
Filed: Oct. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Government's Motion for Alternative Victim Notification procedures pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3771(d)(2). The Court finds that the number of crime victims, as defined by 18 U.S.C. 3771(e), makes it impracticable to accord all of the crime victims located in foreign countries the rights described in 18 U.S.C. 3771(a). The Court further finds that the Government's proposed internet notification is a reasona
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Government's Motion for Alternative Victim Notification procedures pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3771(d)(2). The Court finds that the number of crime victims, as defined by 18 U.S.C. 3771(e), makes it impracticable to accord all of the crime victims located in foreign countries the rights described in 18 U.S.C. 3771(a). The Court further finds that the Government's proposed internet notification is a reasonab..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the Government's Motion for Alternative Victim Notification procedures pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771(d)(2).
The Court finds that the number of crime victims, as defined by 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e), makes it impracticable to accord all of the crime victims located in foreign countries the rights described in 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a). The Court further finds that the Government's proposed internet notification is a reasonable procedure to give effect to 18 U.S.C. § 3771.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Government's Motion for Alternative Victim Notification Procedures (#20) is hereby GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
