U.S. v. DAVIS, 5:11-cr-00032. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20151023k81
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES , District Judge . On August 18, 2015, this Court gave Defendant Davis the opportunity to express his intent with regard to motions filed in his criminal case. Specifically, the Court asked whether or not he wants this Court to treat his Motion (Doc. 122) as 2255. Davis' response was somewhat unclear. He indicated that he desired the Court to extend the time he was given to respond to the August 18, 2015 Order but also answered the Court's question. In an abunda
Summary: ORDER RICHARD L. VOORHEES , District Judge . On August 18, 2015, this Court gave Defendant Davis the opportunity to express his intent with regard to motions filed in his criminal case. Specifically, the Court asked whether or not he wants this Court to treat his Motion (Doc. 122) as 2255. Davis' response was somewhat unclear. He indicated that he desired the Court to extend the time he was given to respond to the August 18, 2015 Order but also answered the Court's question. In an abundan..
More
ORDER
RICHARD L. VOORHEES, District Judge.
On August 18, 2015, this Court gave Defendant Davis the opportunity to express his intent with regard to motions filed in his criminal case. Specifically, the Court asked whether or not he wants this Court to treat his Motion (Doc. 122) as § 2255. Davis' response was somewhat unclear. He indicated that he desired the Court to extend the time he was given to respond to the August 18, 2015 Order but also answered the Court's question. In an abundance of caution, the Court gives Defendant Davis an additional forty (40) days to respond to the questions asked in the Court's August 18, 2015 Order. The Clerk is directed to mail this Order along with the August 18, 2015 Order (Doc. 127) to Defendant.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
