Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. KING, 3:94-CR-30-2. (2015)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20151124b88 Visitors: 12
Filed: Nov. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Nov. 23, 2015
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , Chief District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court following the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, dated November 20, 2015, United States v. Andrew Cardell King , No. 15-6734, which vacated an order of this Court and remanded the case to this Court for further proceedings on the Government's Motion to Authorize Payment from Inmate Trust Account (Doc. No. 200). In light of the Court of Appeals' decision, the Court sets the fo
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court following the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, dated November 20, 2015, United States v. Andrew Cardell King, No. 15-6734, which vacated an order of this Court and remanded the case to this Court for further proceedings on the Government's Motion to Authorize Payment from Inmate Trust Account (Doc. No. 200). In light of the Court of Appeals' decision, the Court sets the following briefing schedule on the Motion to Authorize Payment from Inmate Trust Account.

Defendant shall have forty-five (45) days from his receipt of this Order to file a response to the Government's motion. Defendant shall set forth any and all objections to the Government's motion in this filing. The Court will not consider the arguments made in the previously filed Motion for Reconsideration, as the Court of Appeals has implicitly decided that was not sufficient to constitute an opportunity to be heard.

The Government shall have fourteen (14) calendar days following service of Defendant's response to file any reply brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer