Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 23), filed on November 5, 2015. Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendant to produce certain documents requested in document request numbers 7, 8 and 9 of Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, served on Defendants on March 12, 2015. Defendant responded to these requests on May 13, 2015, objecting on the grounds that the requests were overly broad, unduly burdensome, and
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 23), filed on November 5, 2015. Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendant to produce certain documents requested in document request numbers 7, 8 and 9 of Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, served on Defendants on March 12, 2015. Defendant responded to these requests on May 13, 2015, objecting on the grounds that the requests were overly broad, unduly burdensome, and ..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Doc. No. 23), filed on November 5, 2015. Plaintiff seeks to compel Defendant to produce certain documents requested in document request numbers 7, 8 and 9 of Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents, served on Defendants on March 12, 2015. Defendant responded to these requests on May 13, 2015, objecting on the grounds that the requests were overly broad, unduly burdensome, and unlikely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.
Based upon the Court's review of the Plaintiff's motion and the Defendant's brief in opposition, the Court finds that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is untimely, and the requests are overly-broad, unduly burdensome, and outside the scope permitted by Rule 26(b)(1). Accordingly,
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel is hereby DENIED.
