IN RE CEI, LLC, 1:15-cv-00172-MOC (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20151222c97
Visitors: 11
Filed: Dec. 21, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 21, 2015
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court sua sponte to enlarge the time for Appellees to file a response to Appellant's Brief (#12). Having conferred with all counsel of record in this matter, it appears that unforeseen circumstances frustrated Appellees' ability to file a timely response brief, but that they do intend to respond. Given that Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8018 contemplates a response from Appellees, and that a brief stating the legal positions of t
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court sua sponte to enlarge the time for Appellees to file a response to Appellant's Brief (#12). Having conferred with all counsel of record in this matter, it appears that unforeseen circumstances frustrated Appellees' ability to file a timely response brief, but that they do intend to respond. Given that Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8018 contemplates a response from Appellees, and that a brief stating the legal positions of th..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court sua sponte to enlarge the time for Appellees to file a response to Appellant's Brief (#12). Having conferred with all counsel of record in this matter, it appears that unforeseen circumstances frustrated Appellees' ability to file a timely response brief, but that they do intend to respond. Given that Fed. R. Bankr. P. 8018 contemplates a response from Appellees, and that a brief stating the legal positions of the involved parties would greatly benefit efficient resolution of this matter, the court will grant its own motion and allow Appellees additional time to respond.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Appellees respond to Appellant's Brief (#12) on or before January 29, 2016.
Source: Leagle
