HUNTER v. U.S., 3:15-cv-00333-MOC. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160111796
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aide, or Correct Sentence, which contains a Motion to Dismiss within the body of the response. Having considered respondent's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that petitioner is ALLOWED 30 days within which to file a Reply to the respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion to V
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aide, or Correct Sentence, which contains a Motion to Dismiss within the body of the response. Having considered respondent's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that petitioner is ALLOWED 30 days within which to file a Reply to the respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Va..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aide, or Correct Sentence, which contains a Motion to Dismiss within the body of the response. Having considered respondent's motion and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that petitioner is ALLOWED 30 days within which to file a Reply to the respondent's Response to Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aide, or Correct Sentence (#15), which contains a Motion to Dismiss. Petitioner is instructed that this is his opportunity to explain in writing to the court why the legal reasons given by the government in support of its Motion to Dismiss are wrong.
Source: Leagle
