Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. RUMFELT, 1:12-cr-00012-MR-DLH-3. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20160209a36 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 08, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2016
Summary: ORDER MARTIN REIDINGER , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Defendant's letter, which the Court construes as a motion for early termination of supervised release [Doc. 72]. Counsel for the Government and the Defendant's supervising probation officer have advised the Court's chambers that there is no opposition to the Defendant's motion. Upon review of the Defendant's motion, the Court is satisfied that the early termination of the Defendant's supervised release is
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the Defendant's letter, which the Court construes as a motion for early termination of supervised release [Doc. 72]. Counsel for the Government and the Defendant's supervising probation officer have advised the Court's chambers that there is no opposition to the Defendant's motion.

Upon review of the Defendant's motion, the Court is satisfied that the early termination of the Defendant's supervised release is warranted by the Defendant's conduct and is in the interest of justice. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(1).

Accordingly, IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's letter, which the Court construes as a motion for early termination of supervised release [Doc. 72], is GRANTED, and the Defendant's term of supervised release is hereby terminated.

The Clerk of Court is directed to provide copies of this Order to the Defendant, counsel for the Government, and United States Probation Officer Christine Puhl.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer