Palacino v. Beech Mountain Resort, Inc., 1:13 CV 334. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160216a86
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the undersigned pursuant to a Motion in Limine No.1 (#67) filed by Defendant. The Motion in Limine is not supported by a brief. LCvR 7.1(C) states: (C) Requirement of Briefs. Briefs shall be filed contemporaneously with the motion, except no brief is required in support of timely motions for extension of time, continuances, admission pro hac vice , or early discovery. Exhibits in support of a brief shall be attached as a
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER is before the undersigned pursuant to a Motion in Limine No.1 (#67) filed by Defendant. The Motion in Limine is not supported by a brief. LCvR 7.1(C) states: (C) Requirement of Briefs. Briefs shall be filed contemporaneously with the motion, except no brief is required in support of timely motions for extension of time, continuances, admission pro hac vice , or early discovery. Exhibits in support of a brief shall be attached as ap..
More
ORDER
DENNIS L. HOWELL, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the undersigned pursuant to a Motion in Limine No.1 (#67) filed by Defendant. The Motion in Limine is not supported by a brief. LCvR 7.1(C) states:
(C) Requirement of Briefs. Briefs shall be filed contemporaneously with the motion, except no brief is required in support of timely motions for extension of time, continuances, admission pro hac vice, or early discovery. Exhibits in support of a brief shall be attached as appendices as specified in the Administrative Procedures. Factual contentions shall be supported as specifically as possible by citation to exhibit number and page.
Due to the fact Defendant did not support its motion with a brief, the motion will be denied without prejudice.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion in Limine No.1 (#67) filed by Defendant is DENIED without prejudice for failure of Defendant's counsel to comply with LCvR 7.1(C).
Source: Leagle
