Short v. Loose, 1:03-CV-00048-GCM. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160224c41
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Appellant Todd W. Short's Motion for Reconsideration to Expedite Ruling. (Doc. No. 26) In his Motion, Appellant asks the Court to Rule on his Motion for Relief from Judgments. (Doc. No. 21) Because the Court denied Appellant's Motion in a written order on January 19, 2016 (Doc. No. 24), the instant Motion will be DENIED AS MOOT. To the extent that Appellant argues he did not receive notice of the previous order
Summary: ORDER GRAHAM C. MULLEN , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on Appellant Todd W. Short's Motion for Reconsideration to Expedite Ruling. (Doc. No. 26) In his Motion, Appellant asks the Court to Rule on his Motion for Relief from Judgments. (Doc. No. 21) Because the Court denied Appellant's Motion in a written order on January 19, 2016 (Doc. No. 24), the instant Motion will be DENIED AS MOOT. To the extent that Appellant argues he did not receive notice of the previous order,..
More
ORDER
GRAHAM C. MULLEN, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on Appellant Todd W. Short's Motion for Reconsideration to Expedite Ruling. (Doc. No. 26) In his Motion, Appellant asks the Court to Rule on his Motion for Relief from Judgments. (Doc. No. 21) Because the Court denied Appellant's Motion in a written order on January 19, 2016 (Doc. No. 24), the instant Motion will be DENIED AS MOOT. To the extent that Appellant argues he did not receive notice of the previous order, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to reissue the electronic notification.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
