U.S. v. CORBI, 1:14 cr 90. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160224c44
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 23, 2016
Latest Update: Feb. 23, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER has come before the undersigned upon referral from United States District Judge Martin Reidinger of a notification (#28) by the Defendant that he wished to terminate his retained counsel. In a letter dated February 16, 2016, Defendant had advised his retained counsel James Mills that Mr. Corbi wished to terminate the attorney/client relationship between himself and Mr. Mills. The case came before Judge Reidinger for sentencing on Febr
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER has come before the undersigned upon referral from United States District Judge Martin Reidinger of a notification (#28) by the Defendant that he wished to terminate his retained counsel. In a letter dated February 16, 2016, Defendant had advised his retained counsel James Mills that Mr. Corbi wished to terminate the attorney/client relationship between himself and Mr. Mills. The case came before Judge Reidinger for sentencing on Febru..
More
ORDER
DENNIS L. HOWELL, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER has come before the undersigned upon referral from United States District Judge Martin Reidinger of a notification (#28) by the Defendant that he wished to terminate his retained counsel. In a letter dated February 16, 2016, Defendant had advised his retained counsel James Mills that Mr. Corbi wished to terminate the attorney/client relationship between himself and Mr. Mills. The case came before Judge Reidinger for sentencing on February 18, 2016 and at that time, Judge Reidinger continued the sentencing hearing and referred the matter concerning counsel to the undersigned.
At the call of this matter on for hearing, the Defendant advised the Court he wished to withdraw his letter (#28) and he wished to have Mr. Mills continue to represent him in this matter. Mr. Mills advised he would do so. As a result, the undersigned will allow the motion to withdraw the letter terminating his attorney.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the letter dated February 16, 2016 (#28) from the Defendant is hereby considered to be WITHDRAWN and the issue is now moot. Mr. Mills shall continue to represent the Defendant in this matter.
Source: Leagle
