Reid v. Colvin, 3:15-cv-00322-FDW-DSC. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160323d54
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2016
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). (Doc. No. 15). The Court, having examined Defendant's objections to the M&R (Doc. No. 16), and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 17), and having made a de novo finding with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby OVERRULE Defendant's objections and ADOPTS and APPROVES the findings and recommendations set forth in the M&R. 1 The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for S
Summary: ORDER FRANK D. WHITNEY , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). (Doc. No. 15). The Court, having examined Defendant's objections to the M&R (Doc. No. 16), and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 17), and having made a de novo finding with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby OVERRULE Defendant's objections and ADOPTS and APPROVES the findings and recommendations set forth in the M&R. 1 The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Su..
More
ORDER
FRANK D. WHITNEY, District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Memorandum and Recommendation ("M&R"). (Doc. No. 15). The Court, having examined Defendant's objections to the M&R (Doc. No. 16), and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. No. 17), and having made a de novo finding with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby OVERRULE Defendant's objections and ADOPTS and APPROVES the findings and recommendations set forth in the M&R.1 The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Remand, DENIES Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and REVERSES the Commissioner's decision.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The Court NOTES that Defendant aptly pointed out that the M&R did not address the second issue Plaintiff raised seeking summary judgement "regarding impairments the [Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)] found non-severe...." (Doc. No. 16, n. 1). In light of the remand, the ALJ may consider this issue during the rehearing.
Source: Leagle
