Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Attah, 3:16-cr-00041-MOC-DCK. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina Number: infdco20160328b75 Visitors: 24
Filed: Mar. 24, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 24, 2016
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue. Having considered defendant's motions and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order. ORDER IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's oral Motion to Continue is GRANTED, this matter is continued to the next criminal term, and the court finds the delay caused by such continuance shall be excluded in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), as failure
More

ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion to Continue. Having considered defendant's motions and reviewed the pleadings, the court enters the following Order.

ORDER

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's oral Motion to Continue is GRANTED, this matter is continued to the next criminal term, and the court finds the delay caused by such continuance shall be excluded in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), as failure to grant such a continuance would deny counsel for the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Further, the ends of justice served by granting such continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Specifically, defendant and counsel have shown a need for additional time to review discovery and other materials in preparing for trial or other resolution of this matter. This matter is continued to the May 2016 term, and the time is excluded.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer