U.S. v. Massey, 3:95-cr-00031-MOC. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160401f21
Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 31, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2016
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion for Termination of Supervised Release. While such motion does not reflect whether defendant's supervising officer agrees to early termination, the court has contacted the United States Probation Office and it appears from an email from the Supervisory USPO Office that neither USPO Bonelli nor USPO Horton oppose the request as defendant has, despite an earlier violation, been compliant for 5 y
Summary: ORDER MAX O. COGBURN, Jr. , District Judge . THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion for Termination of Supervised Release. While such motion does not reflect whether defendant's supervising officer agrees to early termination, the court has contacted the United States Probation Office and it appears from an email from the Supervisory USPO Office that neither USPO Bonelli nor USPO Horton oppose the request as defendant has, despite an earlier violation, been compliant for 5 ye..
More
ORDER
MAX O. COGBURN, Jr., District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the court on defendant's Motion for Termination of Supervised Release. While such motion does not reflect whether defendant's supervising officer agrees to early termination, the court has contacted the United States Probation Office and it appears from an email from the Supervisory USPO Office that neither USPO Bonelli nor USPO Horton oppose the request as defendant has, despite an earlier violation, been compliant for 5 years. The court will, therefore, grant the defendant's request but caution him to remain on the better path he has chosen as the alternative is simply more incarceration.
ORDER
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Termination of Supervised Release (#404) is GRANTED and supervision is TERMINATED successfully.
Source: Leagle
