CORESLAB STRUCTURES (ATLANTA), INC. v. MAGEST BUILDING SYSTEMS LIMITED, 1:15cv204. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. North Carolina
Number: infdco20160504d41
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 03, 2016
Latest Update: May 03, 2016
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the Joint Motion Governing Clawback of Inadvertently Produced Documents [# 24]. The parties in this case have jointly filed a copy of an agreement between them governing how the parties intend to handle the inadvertent production of documents in discovery. The parties, however, filed this agreement as a motion. Upon a review of the pleading, the Court is unclear why the parties have filed their executed agreement as a m
Summary: ORDER DENNIS L. HOWELL , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the Joint Motion Governing Clawback of Inadvertently Produced Documents [# 24]. The parties in this case have jointly filed a copy of an agreement between them governing how the parties intend to handle the inadvertent production of documents in discovery. The parties, however, filed this agreement as a motion. Upon a review of the pleading, the Court is unclear why the parties have filed their executed agreement as a mo..
More
ORDER
DENNIS L. HOWELL, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the Joint Motion Governing Clawback of Inadvertently Produced Documents [# 24]. The parties in this case have jointly filed a copy of an agreement between them governing how the parties intend to handle the inadvertent production of documents in discovery. The parties, however, filed this agreement as a motion. Upon a review of the pleading, the Court is unclear why the parties have filed their executed agreement as a motion in this Court, much less what the parties want this Court to rule on. The parties are certainly entitled to enter various agreements among themselves regarding the handling of discovery without seeking the intervention of this Court. To the extent that the parties seek a protective order from the Court, then the parties should file a motion for a protective order with a legal memorandum setting forth the relief sought by the parties. Accordingly, the Court DENIES without prejudice the motion [# 24].
Source: Leagle
